Meet Kenny: The personification of BFT Mastclimbing’s attention to detail

BFT Mastclimbing is a byword for excellence and attention to detail. Our consistency in delivering quality work for construction projects up and down the UK has catapulted us to becoming industry leaders in the field of MCWPs and mast climbing.

Nobody encapsulates our high standards more than Kenny, who you can see in the picture.
He has been working for BFT for the last few months. He came to us from a scaffold background and his role is to check every fitting, ensuring it is cleaned and in good working order so that when it is sent on a job, it performs its function without any delays.
His job is literally to service every single coupling that comes back from a project. For some this may sound tedious but that is far from the case with Kenny. His passion, care and attention to detail is genuinely inspiring and the great pride he takes in his job is something we can all learn from.
The devil is in the detail and this saying has never been truer.
His role links into every one of the values here at BFT:
    Safety – Ensuring that every part is maintained and fit for purpose
    Efficiency – no time delays created by having the wrong or broken parts on the job. This enables our install teams to work to their maximum capacity,
    Value – Linked to the above. We know we are going to deliver the best service, on time due to ensuring every little detail like this is thought about.

Looking after the smaller details enables the bigger project to be able to carry on successfully.

What is mastclimbing?

Kenny’s vital work allows BFT Mastclimbing to carry out important work at height on buildings, which includes cladding, maintenance and other construction projects.
Mast climbing provides a viable alternative to traditional scaffolding by using mast climbers to gain access to high rise buildings.
Our form of accessing a building facade through MCWPs provides greater value for money the taller a building is. It provides greater value for money than scaffolding and has better environmental impacts on noise and visual pollution.
Mast climbing equipment can be constructed and taken down in just four days, compared with 30 days for the scaffolding equivalent.
Our staff are also able to work in a more optimal position, rather than having to bend down and work in unusual bodily positions, which is what is required from scaffolding.

Learn more about BFT Mastclimbing

We invite people to ask questions and fully understand the processes behind the scenes that go into preparing and ensuring that your BFT Mastclimber is the best machine on the market that will help add value to your projects.
We work across the UK, with our two main offices in Manchester and Leighton Buzzard.
If you want to learn more about why BFT Mastclimbing beats all the competition with our MCWPs, for detailed case studies on our projects or to explore why you should use us for your next construction project, call us on 0808 178 9772 or email us at BFTSales@bftmastclimbing.com

Understanding the Government Code of Remediation

The Government Code of Remediation is structured into four parts: the scope; undertaking remediation; living with remediation; and general compliance. Each part addresses key aspects of cladding remediation projects, to mitigate fire safety risks that are present within buildings that feature external cladding whilst ensuring the safety and satisfaction of residents. It applies to buildings regardless of occupancy levels, whether fully, partially, or temporarily occupied.

Resident-Centric Approach

The Code puts residents at the heart of remediation. It is a direct response to the Grenfell tragedy, designed to protect residents from potential fire hazards and ensure their concerns are acknowledged throughout the remediation process.

Roles, Responsibilities And Accountability

The Code mandates that roles and responsibilities related to remediation must be clearly outlined and understood by all parties involved in the project. This includes contractors, developers, building owners, tenants, residents, and management companies, so each party knows its duties and is held accountable. Parties involved in the project cannot avoid Code compliance by delegating or subcontracting their obligations.

Effective Communication and Active Engagement

It’s stated in the Code that good communication needs to be maintained from the outset of the project so that residents remain informed and sufficient transparency is achieved. Proper channels should be implemented to ensure that residents can meaningfully engage in the decision-making process. The Code acknowledges potential language barriers and encourages the use of electronic forums to ensure information is disseminated efficiently. Residents should be kept up-to-date with project developments, enabling them to contribute and participate in the design and delivery of the project.

Minimising Impact On Residents

A significant focus within the Code is on minimising the impact of remedial works on residents. Contractors and developers are expected to take measures to reduce disturbances from on-site activity, including noise, dust, and general inconvenience so that disturbances to the residents are kept to a minimum. Balancing health and safety considerations with cost and time factors is another key pillar of Part 3 of the Code. The goal is to create the least inconvenience to the residents and achieve potential cost savings for contractors and developers.

Mental and Physical Health Of Residents

Acknowledging the potential impact on residents' mental and physical health, the Code mandates careful consideration and documentation of these aspects throughout recladding projects. This additional step of record-keeping holds parties accountable for their actions and highlights the seriousness of their responsibilities.

Revaluating Your Access Method

The Government Code of Remediation sets a high standard for remediation projects with a key goal to minimise the effect recladding has on the residents. The core objective of the Code revolves around mitigating the impact on residents' homes and common facilities, while concurrently prioritising the safety and security of the building and its inhabitants.

In this context, the Code calls into question the appropriateness of using scaffolding for extended periods. A two-year presence of scaffolding, according to the principles outlined in the Code, appears incongruent with the commitment to minimise impact and ensure safety, particularly concerning security issues and prolonged inconveniences for residents.