What new mast climbing machines have arrived at BFT Mastclimbing?

BFT Mastclimbing has recently taken delivery of a further 28 brand new BFT120 Mastclimbing machines.
These new machines are all part of our efforts to continue to renew our fleet and keep to our targets of not having any machines in our fleet older than 15 years old. Whilst this is indeed a challenging objective, it has always been really important to us to ensure that we put safety at the very forefront of all decisions that we make. As market leaders, we are always striving to maintain and improve standards in every aspect of our operations.
The BFT120 machine is one of the most important machines in our fleet. It specifically can reach heights of 130m with a total platform length of 30m when in a twin mast configuration. The standard platform is 1.1m wide with a max SWL capacity of 3,700kg, making it very versatile and suitable for many different construction projects. With approximately 600 of this machine type currently on our fleet, this makes up around one third of our fleet.

High MCWP safety standards

The new machines, like the rest of our 1,800 fleet, are all sourced from our existing European manufacturers that we have held long-standing relationships with. They come with our own branded decals to help customers distinguish between the models easier. BFT has also ensured the machines have CE certification and will all have full service records available throughout their life at BFT. It is important to note that these high quality machines meet all UK construction safety standards and we would actively encourage contractors to book a visit to our H&S and maintenance facilities to see for themselves how this will benefit their projects.
By keeping the machines maintained via rigorous safety checks both on site and back in our new maintenance facilities, we are proud of our safety record and look forward to having more brand new machines out on sites in 2022.

The MCWP range

Our range starts at the lightweight BFT90 machine. This is ideal for small jobs in those tight places where access is really a challenge or on roofs where loadings are even more imperative. BFT’s range goes up to our BFT150, which is the heavyweight machine with a large 1500, wide platform and is capable of taking safe working loads of up to 5 tonnes, making it increasingly popular with bricklayers. The BFT130 machine is one of the most popular due to the increased flexibility it offers around tie points. By design it can go between 9m and 12m tie points which often solves logistical challenges on site. It can carry similar safe working loads to the BFT150 but is more manoeuvrable on site.

Contact us today

If you are interested in working with BFT or if you want to come and visit our facilities, get in touch with us today. You can email call 0808 178 9772 or email BFTsales@bftmastclimbing.com

Understanding the Government Code of Remediation

The Government Code of Remediation is structured into four parts: the scope; undertaking remediation; living with remediation; and general compliance. Each part addresses key aspects of cladding remediation projects, to mitigate fire safety risks that are present within buildings that feature external cladding whilst ensuring the safety and satisfaction of residents. It applies to buildings regardless of occupancy levels, whether fully, partially, or temporarily occupied.

Resident-Centric Approach

The Code puts residents at the heart of remediation. It is a direct response to the Grenfell tragedy, designed to protect residents from potential fire hazards and ensure their concerns are acknowledged throughout the remediation process.

Roles, Responsibilities And Accountability

The Code mandates that roles and responsibilities related to remediation must be clearly outlined and understood by all parties involved in the project. This includes contractors, developers, building owners, tenants, residents, and management companies, so each party knows its duties and is held accountable. Parties involved in the project cannot avoid Code compliance by delegating or subcontracting their obligations.

Effective Communication and Active Engagement

It’s stated in the Code that good communication needs to be maintained from the outset of the project so that residents remain informed and sufficient transparency is achieved. Proper channels should be implemented to ensure that residents can meaningfully engage in the decision-making process. The Code acknowledges potential language barriers and encourages the use of electronic forums to ensure information is disseminated efficiently. Residents should be kept up-to-date with project developments, enabling them to contribute and participate in the design and delivery of the project.

Minimising Impact On Residents

A significant focus within the Code is on minimising the impact of remedial works on residents. Contractors and developers are expected to take measures to reduce disturbances from on-site activity, including noise, dust, and general inconvenience so that disturbances to the residents are kept to a minimum. Balancing health and safety considerations with cost and time factors is another key pillar of Part 3 of the Code. The goal is to create the least inconvenience to the residents and achieve potential cost savings for contractors and developers.

Mental and Physical Health Of Residents

Acknowledging the potential impact on residents' mental and physical health, the Code mandates careful consideration and documentation of these aspects throughout recladding projects. This additional step of record-keeping holds parties accountable for their actions and highlights the seriousness of their responsibilities.

Revaluating Your Access Method

The Government Code of Remediation sets a high standard for remediation projects with a key goal to minimise the effect recladding has on the residents. The core objective of the Code revolves around mitigating the impact on residents' homes and common facilities, while concurrently prioritising the safety and security of the building and its inhabitants.

In this context, the Code calls into question the appropriateness of using scaffolding for extended periods. A two-year presence of scaffolding, according to the principles outlined in the Code, appears incongruent with the commitment to minimise impact and ensure safety, particularly concerning security issues and prolonged inconveniences for residents.